Below is my review of an article posted in the Scientific American Magazine, May 2009 and below is a link to the original article.

Could Food Shortages Bring Down Civilization or Perhaps a Summary of Humanity?
We owe some gratitude to Lester Brown for cleverly tackling such an important issue as food shortage and creating an awareness of this very real threat for our entire planet. In his article within the 2009 May issue of Scientific American: “Could Food Shortages Bring Down Civilization?”
Mr. Brown weaves a picture of the future of our planet and it is a dismal and frightening one. His bold use of explicit adjectives and adverbs paints a very real picture of a future where we must step up and make great efforts to change or suffer the dire complications.
The great misconception that hunger affects only a small portion of our planet was ripped from my thought process as I realized while reading this article that we are indeed all affected.
The global stability of our planet is actually teetering on a severely limited water supply and most of us move through life unknowingly complicating the problem.
In America, we seem to be largely a nation of self-absorbed people swimming in a lake of denial and our world’s fresh water supply is in grave danger.
This danger is so pressing that it has already affected Somalia, Afghanistan, Rwanda, India, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The dramatic result is found in these nations turning to drugs, weapons, war, political instability, piracy, terrorism, genocide, as well as death and disease.
China is already drilling the last of their water table but they are not worried as they have bought out America’s vast debt. This debt assures them that America can be expected to not only support them with our resources but bail them out of their water emergency which is just on the horizon.
History has already shown us how food shortages adversely affect the economy as well as health. This has a ripple effect all over our planet. Water yields plant life-grain, literally feeds us and all animal life, and thus begins the circle of life or the link in the chain which may undo us all if it is not protected.
We must fight deforestation, soil erosion, perfect irrigation and technology to preserve our valued resources. Controlling population seems unrealistic but necessary.
Ultimately…
To simply summarize this article would not do it justice. Lester Brown is a very talented writer and has successfully motivated me to this cause with his persuasive argument.
The realization that our future is held within our limited water resources world-wide is a provocative and demanding fact. Mr. Brown did not just toss facts at us but endeared this important cause to all humanity that reads this article.
It is the actual soil we must protect and the water that nourishes it.
The technological terminology and facts were not lost amongst the vivid adjectives, adverbs and verbs which uniquely personalized his intent.
Restoring the earth’s natural systems and resources is just the beginning. We must reduce net carbon dioxide emissions, raise energy efficiency and develop renewable energy.
Using the amount of grain that would feed one person for a year to create the small amount of ethanol to fill one 25-gallon tank for an automobile is ridiculous.
Our two most valuable resources, water and time, are not replenishable nor or they unlimited. Time is of the essence and water is disappearing before our eyes. Our future is evaporating.
If we could step back and look at all this logically, it would be obvious that we should spend the fraction of what we spend on global military spending for a much more reasonable focus, saving our planet.
It would seem a simple thing to actively promote population control, make sure health care is available to everyone as well as food.
Restoring and preserving the precious water tables we have is imperative. Education is the key to accomplishing all these goals.
Obviously Mr. Brown has won me over to his cause. I felt inspired to action which of course would be the greatest accomplishment a writer could obtain, and I am very impressed with Mr. Lester Brown and his message.
The article by Mr. Brown has now been restated by me in an emotional plea for us all to look at our planet differently and actively do what we can to encourage changes that are necessary. This is a race I hope we win.
It is interesting how an article can move you to change, foster thinking and create possibilities. These changes, critical thinking and hopeful possibilities are our future.
This month I plan to plant a few trees, quit buying bottled water, adjust my sprinklers on the lawn, and create a t-shirt which will simply say “Got Water?”
It will be my way of stimulating the critical thinking and open conversations to ideas which will help save our planet. This may be simple compared to the wonderful visuals in Lester Brown’s article however I hope they endear others to this cause.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=civilization-food-short...
Comfort
wouldn't it be easier to wipe out segments of society (just the ones i don't like)
1***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
Well...as long as they leave the water....
2yes - the water issue is our biggest issue...
3that's the whole point of removing certain groups - you get their land and resources if you do it right.
4***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
Samantha999...where would you start? I suppose you could just throw a dart at a map.
Many believe the US should just quit intervening and then let history run it's course.
Some zealous individuals think we should step back and let some groups just kill each other until they finally give up--because they view our presence there as perpetuating the fight and preventing an ultimate end....but we want too badly to push the outcome to sway our way.
Me...I think if women ran the world NONE of this would be an issue. Gosh, I guess that makes me sexist.
5So you think we should continue to send our young men and women into harm's way for groups that really want us dead? That it is our job to police the world.
My original remarks were tongue and cheek. And women have worst tempers the men. Do you really think we would try cuddling and talking to someone who has just blown us up? I don't.
6***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
Actually I think women would work together better than men do when they run the show. I happen to be very mild tempered. I am usually the one quietly listening until everyone has finished yelling and when they are ready to listen--I speak.
Observing quietly is a skill I have managed to perfect. In fact, I spent a LONG time on this site just reading comments and so forth before I actually took the step to join in on the banter and conversation.
On the Internet, sarcasm and just plain cheekiness fails to translate well. I have a bad habit of coming across using both of those---without any intent to.
When I do get angry I spend a tremendous amount of time trying to understand it before I react. I am famous for writing lengthy mad e-mails and NEVER sending them.
PLEASE never think my retorts are angry or reactionary. I am simply a very cheeky person. When I am angry--snotty--and mean--I am far more obvious. Usually I am much like you--just very cheeky...aka tongue-in-cheek.
This issue---water---is a serious one. I am not one to usually jump on the ecological wagon, but lately everything I read points to doom. I am not looking forward to doom. Don't want my kids to experience it either.
Our troops--having been one myself, I realize the reasoning/political positioning/money involved...but somehow I cannot rationalize the death that is occurring. America has not had a war on their own soil for a tremendously long time--hence, they do not really feel the impact unless someone close to them dies.
With this article (link at end) I realized how a simple thing such as water--the lack of it--has resulted in conflicts that are beyond tragic, and we are looking at it becoming much worse if we do not act.
It is a weird "water prevents war" argument that sort of made sense to me. We have fought over oil, freedom, tyranny...the future war will be over water and food. We can prevent that....even being cheeky about it.
7Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.